From evidence to a trusted decision
Show one end-to-end decision lifecycle with evidence and human approval. A meeting note is not an approved decision. Here is the difference.
The video already shows burned-in subtitles; this adds the separate caption track.
Chapters
Descriptive transcript
Read the full transcript, including what happens on screen
Demo environment · synthetic workspace and data · backend responses are simulated. A meeting note is not an approved decision
The extraction result, the checks, the approval, the approved decision and the Ask DM answer are SIMULATED: this guide uses a synthetic workspace and fixture data, not a deployed backend or a real AI run. It shows the sequence DM is designed around: a source becomes a proposal, a person approves it, and only then can it be recalled as approved knowledge. It does not claim every decision in a real workspace is captured or available.
A banner reading "Demo environment · synthetic workspace and data · backend responses are simulated" stays on screen for the whole video.
00:00–00:10 · launch
On screen: Start on "Add to DM" (/add). Click "Source-based intake". The next view is "Source-based intake" (/add/source). A highlight labelled "Source-based intake" marks "Source-based intake You have source material. DM understands it and p…".
Narrator: A meeting note is not an approved decision. Here is the difference.
Narrator: Start in Add to DM, with a source you already have.
00:10–00:13 · material
On screen: Click "Add source material". The next view is "Add source material" (/intake/bundles/new). A highlight labelled "Add source material" marks "Add source material Paste text and/or attach files together. DM analy…".
Narrator: Choose Add source material.
00:13–00:19 · paste
On screen: Type "Sync notes: we agreed that any migration touching production schema needs two reviewers. A single-reviewer migration dropped an index in the spring. Priya owns the rule." into the "Paste text" field. A highlight marks "The source note".
Narrator: Paste the note. It holds the choice, and the reason behind it.
00:19–00:23 · analyze
On screen: Click "Analyze with DM". The next view is "Pasted notes" (/intake/bundles/bundle-two-reviewers). A highlight marks "Analyze with DM".
Narrator: Select Analyze with DM.
00:23–00:32 · candidate
On screen: Click "Review". The next view is "Production schema changes" (/candidates/cand-two-reviewers/review). A highlight labelled "Nothing is approved yet" marks "Source material produces candidates for review. Approved candidates b…".
Narrator: DM proposes one decision candidate. It is a proposal, so it still needs a person.
Narrator: Select Review.
00:32–00:40 · understand
On screen: Click "Continue". The next view is "Production schema changes" (/candidates/cand-two-reviewers/review). A highlight labelled "Statement and reason" marks "Any migration that touches production schema needs approval from two…".
Narrator: Check what DM understood, and where it came from.
Narrator: The statement and its reason match the note.
00:40–00:44 · place
On screen: Click "Next". The next view is "Production schema changes" (/candidates/cand-two-reviewers/review). A highlight labelled "Next" marks "Next →".
Narrator: Place is optional here, so continue.
00:44–00:50 · check
On screen: Click "Continue to Refine". The next view is "Production schema changes" (/candidates/cand-two-reviewers/review). A highlight labelled "Blocking issues" marks "0".
Narrator: Check lists any blocking issues. DM found none here.
00:50–00:55 · refine
On screen: Click "Continue". The next view is "Production schema changes" (/candidates/cand-two-reviewers/review). A highlight marks "Edit if needed".
Narrator: Refine is where you would correct the wording. It is right as written.
00:55–00:59 · confirm
On screen: Click "Approve". The next view is "Pasted notes" (/intake/bundles/bundle-two-reviewers). A highlight marks "Approve".
Narrator: A person approves. Select Approve.
00:59–01:05 · approved-bundle
On screen: Click "View approved knowledge". The next view is "Knowledge" (/knowledge). A highlight labelled "Approved knowledge" marks "View approved knowledge".
Narrator: DM records the approval as durable knowledge. Open it.
01:05–01:10 · library
On screen: Click "Select the decision". The next view is "Knowledge" (/knowledge). A highlight labelled "The new decision" marks "Any migration that touches production schema needs approval from two…".
Narrator: It now sits in the approved Knowledge library. Select it.
01:10–01:13 · open-decision
On screen: Click "Open decision". The next view is "Two reviewers for production schema changes" (/decisions/dec-review). A highlight labelled "Open the decision" marks "Open decision".
Narrator: Open the decision.
01:13–01:18 · approved
On screen: A highlight labelled "Approved decision" marks "What was decided".
Narrator: The decision has its reason and its source on record.
01:18–01:24 · open-ask
On screen: Click "Ask DM". The next view is "Ask DM" (/ask-dm). A highlight marks "Ask DM".
Narrator: Later, a new teammate wonders why. They open Ask DM.
01:24–01:28 · ask
On screen: Type "Why do production migrations need two reviewers?" into the "Ask a question about decision memory" field. A highlight marks "Your question".
Narrator: They type the question in their own words.
01:28–01:31 · send
On screen: Click "Send". The next view is "Ask DM" (/ask-dm). A highlight marks "Send".
Narrator: Select Send.
01:31–01:40 · answer
On screen: A highlight labelled "Answer from the approved decision" marks "Any migration that touches production schema needs approval from two…".
Narrator: The answer comes from the approved decision, and shows the source it rests on.
Narrator: The team's reasoning is there when it's needed.


